Join the Level Discord — connect with IT professionals, share ideas, and get real-time updates
Check it out.svg)
General
A practical guide for IT professionals evaluating whether starting a managed service provider still makes sense. Covers demand, costs, risks, tooling decisions, and what successful MSPs do differently today.
Level
Monday, January 5, 2026
The managed service provider model continues to attract attention across the IT industry. Rising cybersecurity risk, increasing endpoint sprawl, and ongoing pressure on internal IT teams are forcing organizations to rethink how IT operations are delivered and supported.
At the same time, many IT professionals and operators are evaluating a familiar question through a modern lens.
Is starting an MSP still worth it in 2026 and beyond?
The answer is yes, but the opportunity looks very different than it did a decade ago. Today, success is less about offering generic IT support and more about focus, operational discipline, and delivering measurable outcomes without unnecessary complexity.
This guide is written for IT professionals, consultants, and operators evaluating the MSP model. It covers how demand is evolving, where real opportunity exists, what it costs to operate, the most common hurdles, and how tooling decisions influence long-term viability.
A managed service provider delivers ongoing IT management, security, and operational support under a subscription model. The goal is not just to fix issues, but to reduce risk, standardize environments, and keep systems stable over time.
Core MSP responsibilities typically include:
For some organizations, MSPs function as a fully outsourced IT department. For others, they act as an extension of an internal IT team that lacks time, staffing, or specialized expertise.
The defining characteristic is proactive service delivery rather than reactive break-fix work.
Despite market maturity, demand for managed services continues to expand for structural reasons.
IT systems now sit directly on the critical path of business operations. Downtime impacts revenue, productivity, customer trust, and regulatory posture. Even smaller organizations rely on cloud platforms, SaaS tools, identity systems, and remote access infrastructure to function.
As IT environments become more complex, businesses increasingly look to external providers to reduce operational risk.
Cybersecurity threats affect organizations of every size. Ransomware, phishing, and identity compromise are no longer edge cases. They are recurring risks.
Many organizations do not have the internal capability to manage security continuously. MSPs provide structured enforcement, monitoring, and response that internal teams often struggle to sustain.
Organizations with lean IT teams face tool bloat, alert fatigue, and manual workload accumulation. MSPs help by standardizing configurations, automating routine tasks, and providing additional operational coverage.
This pressure is not temporary. Hiring remains difficult and expensive, making managed services a long-term strategy rather than a stopgap.
The MSP market has a high number of providers, but that does not mean it is saturated with quality.
Organizations commonly report dissatisfaction with existing MSP relationships due to:
These gaps create space for MSPs that prioritize clarity, consistency, and operational efficiency.
The opportunity today is not to offer more services. It is to deliver fewer services better.
Successful MSPs rarely position themselves as generalists. The strongest opportunities are found where pain is obvious and recurring.
Security-focused managed services remain one of the fastest-growing segments. Organizations want consistent enforcement, visibility, and response without building full internal security teams.
Businesses increasingly expect proactive remediation rather than constant ticket creation. MSPs that lead with automation and standardization reduce disruption and improve client experience.
Regulated industries such as healthcare, finance, education, and manufacturing require ongoing compliance visibility. MSPs that can operationalize compliance without adding overhead provide significant value.
Hybrid and multi-cloud environments introduce complexity around identity, access, cost control, and security. MSPs that specialize in managing this complexity are in demand.
Recovery readiness has become a board-level concern. MSPs that emphasize recovery time, restoration testing, and continuity planning stand out from those that only provide backups.
Cost is one of the most researched topics for professionals evaluating the MSP model.
Most MSPs incur a combination of fixed and variable costs, including:
Upfront costs often include legal setup, contracts, and a professional web presence.
Well-run MSPs keep early overhead controlled and scale tooling in line with actual client growth.
The biggest cost risk is not underinvestment. It is overinvestment in tools and platforms before revenue justifies them.
Tool sprawl increases complexity, operational failure points, and technician load. MSPs that maintain discipline around tooling tend to reach profitability faster and operate more predictably.
Understanding common challenges helps set realistic expectations.
Winning early clients often depends more on trust and positioning than technical capability. Clear problem statements and focused outreach consistently outperform broad messaging.
Positioning as an MSP for all businesses rarely resonates. Specialization builds credibility and shortens sales cycles.
Ambiguous pricing and undefined scope lead to operational strain. Clear service definitions and enforceable SLAs protect both the provider and the client.
Complex stacks slow onboarding and increase failure risk. MSPs that prioritize integration and simplicity maintain better service consistency.
MSP operators often carry sales, delivery, and administration responsibilities. Without documentation and automation, work becomes reactive and unsustainable.
MSP ownership is less about technical depth and more about operating style.
The model aligns best with professionals who:
Many highly skilled technicians struggle with MSP ownership, while others succeed due to discipline, communication, and consistency.
MSPs that succeed long-term tend to rely on a small number of trusted resources rather than chasing every new trend.
Common resource categories include:
The goal is operational clarity, not information overload.
Tooling choices shape workflows, margins, and scalability. Modern endpoint management platforms aim to reduce manual work, enforce consistency, and support proactive operations.
However, many platforms were designed around legacy MSP models with heavy process layers and high operational overhead. This creates friction for providers that value efficiency.
Level is used by MSPs across a wide range of operational stages, from providers refining their delivery model to established MSPs managing large endpoint environments.
Its appeal comes from balancing simplicity with long-term viability.
Level does not publish a formal breakdown of customer age. A conservative, realistic estimate is that fewer than 10 percent of Level’s MSP customers are providers in their first two years of operation, with the majority consisting of established MSPs that have already moved past the early survival phase.
This matters because it signals intentional adoption rather than default choice.
MSPs choose Level to:
For providers evaluating tooling, this balance allows operational discipline without locking into bloated workflows.
Looking ahead, MSPs that thrive share consistent traits:
The MSP market is not shrinking. It is maturing.
Starting or expanding an MSP in 2026 and beyond remains a viable path for IT professionals and operators who approach it deliberately.
The opportunity is not in offering more services. It is in delivering reliable outcomes with operational discipline.
MSPs that succeed focus on:
For those evaluating the MSP model today, clarity matters more than speed. The strongest MSPs are built steadily, supported by tools and processes that enable growth without unnecessary complexity.
At Level, we understand the modern challenges faced by IT professionals. That's why we've crafted a robust, browser-based Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) platform that's as flexible as it is secure. Whether your team operates on Windows, Mac, or Linux, Level equips you with the tools to manage, monitor, and control your company's devices seamlessly from anywhere.
Ready to revolutionize how your IT team works? Experience the power of managing a thousand devices as effortlessly as one. Start with Level today—sign up for a free trial or book a demo to see Level in action.
General
Start your 14-day free trial today.
