Join the Level Discord — connect with IT professionals, share ideas, and get real-time updates
Check it out.svg)
Automations
7 Best PRTG Alternatives to Consider in 2025: 1. Level 2. Checkmk 3. Zabbix 4. LogicMonitor 5. ManageEngine OpManager 6. Datadog 7. Dynatrace
Level
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
PRTG is one of the most widely known network monitoring solutions on the market. It is used by IT teams to monitor devices, servers, applications, and databases across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. Its broad feature set and long history make it a common starting point for organizations looking to gain visibility into network performance.
However, despite its popularity, many businesses eventually look for alternatives to PRTG. Cost concerns, performance limitations at scale, interface complexity, and platform rigidity often push IT teams to explore more modern options.
This guide reviews the top PRTG alternatives and competitors. You will also learn how network monitoring tools differ, what features matter most, and how to choose the right PRTG alternative for your environment.
Source: Paessler.com
PRTG Network Monitor is developed by Paessler and is designed to provide real-time visibility into network performance. It uses sensors to track metrics across devices, applications, traffic flows, databases, and cloud services.
Key capabilities include customizable dashboards, distributed monitoring through probes, proactive alerts, reporting tools, and mobile access. PRTG supports a wide range of protocols, including SNMP, WMI, NetFlow, and packet sniffing.
While these features make PRTG powerful, they also contribute to its complexity and cost structure.
PRTG uses a sensor-based pricing model that can become expensive as environments scale. Larger networks often require thousands of sensors, which quickly increases annual costs and makes budgeting unpredictable.
Many users report that PRTG’s interface feels dated and unintuitive. Navigation, dashboard customization, and report interpretation can require significant onboarding time.
As the number of monitored devices grows, PRTG installations may experience slower performance, delayed alerts, or server strain, particularly in self-hosted deployments.
Monitoring Linux and macOS systems often requires additional probes and configuration. Compared to newer cloud-native platforms, this adds operational overhead.
Choosing a PRTG alternative should start with understanding why your current monitoring approach no longer meets your needs. Some organizations primarily need network visibility, while others want a platform that combines monitoring with endpoint management, automation, remediation, or observability.
When evaluating alternatives, focus on these core criteria:
Legacy tools like MRTG are still referenced for basic traffic graphing, but modern teams require far more than static bandwidth charts.
If you think that PRTG is not the right network monitoring tool for your needs, you can consider the following alternatives instead:
Level is a modern remote monitoring and management platform designed for internal IT teams and MSPs. It delivers real-time network monitoring alongside endpoint visibility, automation, and secure remote access.
Unlike legacy tools, Level is browser-based and requires no on-premises infrastructure. IT teams can monitor devices across Windows, macOS, Linux, and IoT environments from a single interface.
Key features include threshold-based alerts, background management, automated workflows, patching, and asset inventory. Level is particularly well suited for teams that want monitoring combined with action, not just visibility.
Pricing starts at $2 per endpoint per month with transparent billing.
Source: Checkmk.com
Checkmk is a flexible monitoring platform used in IT operations and DevOps environments. It offers deep visibility into servers, applications, networks, and cloud infrastructure.
With over 2,000 built-in plugins and support for synthetic monitoring, Checkmk works well for complex environments. It supports Kubernetes, Nutanix, and major cloud providers.
Checkmk offers both self-hosted and SaaS plans, making it adaptable but more technical to deploy than simpler platforms.
Source: Zabbix.com
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring solution popular with enterprises that need deep customization. It supports agent-based and agentless monitoring across a wide range of platforms.
Zabbix excels at flexible metric collection and synthetic monitoring but requires strong technical expertise to deploy and maintain. Support and training are paid add-ons.
Source: LogicMonitor.com
LogicMonitor is a SaaS-based observability platform focused on hybrid and cloud environments. It uses an agentless architecture and provides topology mapping, anomaly detection, and dynamic alerting.
It integrates with thousands of technologies and offers strong automation features. Pricing is resource-based and can become costly for large environments.
Source: ManageEngine.com
OpManager provides centralized monitoring for routers, switches, firewalls, servers, and virtual machines. It supports thousands of metrics and includes root cause analysis tools.
Its Probe Central architecture allows it to scale to large environments, though deployment and licensing can become complex at scale.
Source: Datadog.com
Datadog combines infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, log management, and security monitoring into a single platform.
It is especially popular in cloud-native environments and DevOps teams. Datadog excels at visualization and analytics but can become expensive as data volume grows.
Source: Dynatrace.com
Dynatrace offers full-stack observability with AI-driven analytics. It covers infrastructure, applications, user experience, and security monitoring.
Its AI engine analyzes dependencies and root causes automatically, making it powerful but more complex and costly than traditional monitoring tools.
PRTG and Splunk can both provide visibility into IT environments, but they address different core requirements. PRTG is primarily associated with infrastructure and network monitoring, while Splunk is widely used for collecting, searching, analyzing, and correlating machine-generated data such as logs.
As a result, teams researching alternatives to Splunk may prioritize log management, search, analytics, security use cases, and observability. Teams replacing PRTG are more likely to prioritize network health, device availability, performance metrics, alerting, and infrastructure monitoring.
There is increasing overlap between these categories. Platforms such as Datadog and Dynatrace combine infrastructure monitoring with broader observability capabilities. Before choosing a platform, determine whether your primary requirement is network monitoring, endpoint management, log analytics, full-stack observability, or a combination of these functions.
Older tools like MRTG were designed primarily for bandwidth monitoring using SNMP. While MRTG is still useful for basic traffic graphing, it lacks real-time alerting, automation, and multi-dimensional visibility.
Modern platforms expand far beyond what MRTG was built to do. They combine monitoring with remediation, automation, security, and reporting in a single system.
Identify whether your infrastructure is on-premises, cloud, or hybrid. Choose tools that natively support your architecture.
Some teams need deep application visibility, while others prioritize network device monitoring and automation.
Determine which capabilities are essential before comparing platforms. This prevents you from paying for advanced observability or analytics features that your team does not actually need.
Avoid tools where cost scales unpredictably with sensors or data volume.
Look beyond the advertised starting price and determine what happens to costs as you add endpoints, network devices, users, sensors, or data.
Free trials help validate alert accuracy, interface usability, and onboarding effort.
Testing the software with your actual infrastructure can also reveal whether deployment and ongoing administration will require additional IT resources.
Ensure encryption, role-based access, MFA, and audit logs are included.
Security should also extend to remote connections and administrative access, particularly when the monitoring platform has broad visibility or control across your infrastructure.
As environments grow more dynamic, static monitoring approaches become limiting. Teams want tools that not only detect issues but also help resolve them automatically.
The right PRTG alternative can extend monitoring beyond simple alerts by giving IT teams tools for automation, remediation, remote access, and centralized endpoint management.
While MRTG and PRTG laid important groundwork in network monitoring history, modern IT operations demand platforms that integrate monitoring, automation, and endpoint management.
Level is designed for speed, clarity, and action. It provides:
For teams seeking a modern alternative without legacy overhead, Level offers a strong balance between power and simplicity.
Choosing the right PRTG alternative depends on scale, complexity, and operational goals. Legacy tools like MRTG still have niche use cases, but modern IT teams require broader visibility, faster response, and automation built in.
Start by identifying whether your primary requirement is traditional network monitoring, endpoint management, automation, or broader observability. From there, compare platforms based on the capabilities your team will actually use rather than simply choosing the solution with the longest feature list.
By evaluating your environment carefully and testing modern platforms, you can move beyond reactive monitoring and toward proactive, efficient IT operations.
The best alternative depends on your environment and monitoring requirements. Level is designed for IT teams and MSPs that want to combine monitoring with endpoint management, automation, patching, and remote access. Other platforms, such as Checkmk, Zabbix, LogicMonitor, Datadog, and Dynatrace, address different infrastructure and observability requirements.
Companies may evaluate other platforms because of pricing, scalability requirements, interface preferences, platform support, or the need for additional automation and endpoint-management capabilities.
Look for reliable real-time monitoring, customizable alerts, multi-platform support, straightforward pricing, security controls, reporting, and scalability. Teams that want to reduce manual IT work should also consider automation and remediation capabilities.
No. PRTG primarily focuses on monitoring networks and IT infrastructure. Splunk is heavily associated with collecting, searching, and analyzing machine data and logs. Their capabilities can overlap, particularly as monitoring platforms expand into observability, but they generally address different primary use cases.
Yes. MSPs can use network and infrastructure monitoring platforms to oversee customer environments. However, MSPs should also evaluate whether a solution provides endpoint management, automation, remote access, patch management, and scalable administration if they want capabilities beyond network monitoring.
At Level, we understand the modern challenges faced by IT professionals. That's why we've crafted a robust, browser-based Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) platform that's as flexible as it is secure. Whether your team operates on Windows, Mac, or Linux, Level equips you with the tools to manage, monitor, and control your company's devices seamlessly from anywhere.
Ready to revolutionize how your IT team works? Experience the power of managing a thousand devices as effortlessly as one. Start with Level today—sign up for a free trial or book a demo to see Level in action.
Automations
Start your 14-day free trial today.
